Middle East Construction News – Construction Week Online

Home / SPECIAL REPORTS / Construction disputes - the Qatari perspective


Construction disputes - the Qatari perspective

on Apr 25, 2009

  2 Comments
RSS Feeds Print this page

James Bremen, a member of the Global Transactions Practice Group.
James Bremen, a member of the Global Transactions Practice Group.

King & Spalding International Partner in London James Bremen explains how Qatari companies can protect their positions in relation to construction disputes.

Qatar is one of the few states that remains relatively insulated from the economic downturn.  Its massive natural gas reserves put it in a strong position to ride out the current crisis. The result is that development continues apace in Qatar, but from this there will be inveitable construction disputes.

There are certain nuances within the Qatari civil code that all companies carrying out business in Qatar, whether it is a developer or contractor, ought to be aware of  in order to protect their position.

The most effective way for such companies to protect their position, in relation to disputes, is through careful drafting of the dispute resolution clause.

During contract negotiations, where price and commercial risks are considered the most pressing issues, it is all too easy to give no more than a cursory glance towards the back of the agreement to the standard dispute resolution clause. However, adopting a considered approach at the drafting stage could be time well spent if a dispute occurs later in the project.

Story continues below
Advertisement

FEATURED COMMENT

Is there such a thing as paid holiday leave in Doha? or is it all unpaid leave? Thank you. George

  2 Comments

When drafting a dispute resolution clause, consideration ought to be given to the choice of dispute resolution forum. In Qatar, there are two main options: arbitration or litigation. Arbitration is a private process, so negative press can be avoided. It allows the parties to choose the arbitrators, normally with the two nominated arbitrators selecting the chairman.

This has the benefit of ensuring experienced construction arbitrators, which may not be available in the local judiciary. Also, the timing of the process can be managed by the parties in order to expedite the resolution of a dispute.

Litigation in the Qatari Courts

Although the Qatari courts are generally regarded as reliable and predictable, they do not have specific expertise in construction law, and this may be considered a drawback in the context of a highly technical, multi-million dollar construction dispute. Therefore, it may be that Qatari court judges rely on court-appointed construction specialists, which can produce an element of uncertainty where a judge may be led by a technical expert with no legal training.

Where a construction contract has a clause awarding jurisdiction to the Qatari courts, it ought always to be kept in mind that the parties may, depending upon the nature of the dispute, agree an alternative resolution process at the time a dispute arises. 

In our experience it is not uncommon, particularly where claims presented are of a technical nature, for the parties to agree that arbitration ought to replace the contractual agreement to pursue a claim in the Qatari court. However, it is clearly preferable to avoid any such uncertainty by drafting the contract accordingly.

Arbitration in Qatar

The choice of arbitral rules for disputes in Qatar comes down to an internationally recognised arbitration body, such as the ICC and Uncitral, or the Qatar Chamber of Commerce and Industry (QCCI). 

ICC arbitrations are generally managed by the International Court of Arbitration in Paris, while Uncitral arbitrations are managed by a nominated centre; however, there is no reason why the parties could not agree to stage arbitration in Qatar, if this is considered most convenient.

Qatar is a signatory to the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, so a foreign arbitral award would be enforceable in Qatar (providing it came from a country that is also a signatory to the New York Convention).

Arbitration at the QCCI is possible, however, as the QCCI Arbitration Centre is relatively new, some procedural points may be uncertain.

Who is James Bremen?

James Bremen is a member of the Global Transactions Practice Group. Bremen has practised exclusively in construction law for more than a decade and has significant experience in project development and dispute resolution, both in the UK and internationally.   Since 2002 more than half of his practice has been in the GCC.




Readers' Comments


George Kennedy (Dec 15, 2011)
Doha
Qatar

Paid Holidays
Is there such a thing as paid holiday leave in Doha? or is it all unpaid leave? Thank you. George

Jaleel Nazirudeen (Mar 31, 2010)
Tiruchirapalli
India

Qatar Contarctor blues-Saved by Local law
Construction contracts require the contractor to complete work within an agreed time frame. This may be a specific date or a set time period after, for example, execution of the contract or, if applicable, the issue of a notice to proceed. If the contractor fails to complete the works by this date, it is usually required to pay a predetermined amount to compensate the employer for the losses suffered by the employer as a result of such delay. Under English law, such damages are termed liquidated damages and are required to be a genuine pre-estimate of the losses that will be suffered by the employer should completion of the works be delayed. If they are not, then they are penal in nature and unenforceable ? although the employer would be entitled, in these circumstances, to make a general damages claim against the contract (that is, prove its losses before the court or arbitral tribunal). Under the civil codes of most local jurisdictions, the situation is slightly different. For a start, such damages are termed penalties, which are initially alarming to lawyers from England and other common law jurisdictions, which are used to ?penalties? being unenforceable. The major substantive differences between the common law and civil code position is that, under local civil codes, the amount of the penalty can be challenged by either party (rather than just the contractor, as is the case under English law) if the employer?s actual losses are more or less than the penalties that would otherwise be payable. In other words, a court or arbitrator compares the actual losses to the amount of the penalty rather than looking at whether the penalty was a genuine pre-estimate of loss as at the time the contract was entered into. However, it should be noted that the local courts will only reduce or increase penalties if there is a substantial discrepancy between the penalty stated in the contract and the actual loss suffered by the employer. There may be instances where delays to completion may be caused wholly or in part by the employer. For example, the contractor may be given access to the site late; non-payment by the employer may give the contractor a contractual right to suspend; or the employer may exercise a contractual right to suspend the works. The vast majority of standard form of contracts provide for the contractor to be granted extension of time if it is delayed by an act for which the employer is responsible (or for which the employer has accepted the risk where there is an extension of time for, for example, adverse weather conditions). Under English law and other common law jurisdictions, failure to grant an extension of time to the contractual completion date in circumstances where the employer has caused the delay renders the contractual completion date unenforceable (the so-called ?prevention principle?). Instead, time is said to be ?at large? and the contractor?s obligation is to complete the works within a reasonable time. Since the contractual completion date is unenforceable, so are the liquidated damages. The employer?s remedy for the delay in these circumstances is, firstly, to demonstrate that the contractor has failed to complete the works within a reasonable time and, having done so, to prove the losses it has suffered as a result and to seek these as general damages. Local civil codes do not recognise the prevention principle per se. That is, the liquidated damages payable by the contractor for delay are not automatically invalidated if the contractor is not granted an extension of time as a result of delays caused by the employer.


COMMENTS

Name *
Email *
City
Country
Subject: *
Comments: *
Math Question: *
Solve this simple math problem
and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Refresh the image if not clear
Remember me on this computer



NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIPTION
Email:



Arabian Supply Chain Middle East
Hotelier Middle East
Digital Production Middle East
Arabian Oil and Gas Middle East
Construction Week Online - India
Utilities middle east\
Hotelier India
LinkedIn
CWO dotcom



Articles
Companies
ITP.com
Ahlan.ae Masala.ae Ahlanlive.com ArabianBusiness.com ArabianBusiness.com/Arabic ArabianBusiness.com/Jobs ArabianBusiness.com/Property ArabianOilandGas.com ArabianSupplyChain.com ArabianTravelDirectory.com ConstructionWeekOnline.com ConstructionWeekOnline.com DigitalProductionME.com Grazia.ae HotelierMiddleEast.com ITP.net TimeOutAbuDhabi.com TimeOutDubai.com TimeOutTickets.com Utilities-ME.com VivaMagazine.ae commsmea.com designmena.com