Questions have been raised over energy savings in LEED buildings
About 28% to 35% of LEED-certified buildings use more energy than conventional buildings, states a report from the National Research Council of Canada’s Institute for Research in Construction. This is against 18% to 39% using less energy per floor area.
The study also found that the measured energy performance of LEED buildings had little correlation with the certification level of the building, or the number of energy credits achieved by the building at design time.
Therefore the report concluded that, while ‘green’ buildings can contribute substantial energy savings, ‘green’ rating consistency at the individual building level needs to be defined.
Story continues below
Advertisement
FEATURED COMMENT
The importance of green buildings is to decrease the ammount of pollution and to avoid using the materials with high saf
The study essentially re-analysed data supplied by the New Buildings Institute and the US Green Buildings Council on measured energy-use data from 100 LEED-certified commercial and institutional buildings.
This data was compared to the energy use of the general US commercial building stock. The researchers also examined energy use by LEED certification level, and by energy-related credits that are achieved in the certification process.
Page:
1
Readers' Comments
Nader Tawil (Nov 3, 2009) Dubai United Arab Emirates
Sustainable growth
The importance of green buildings is to decrease the ammount of pollution and to avoid using the materials with high safety factors.
one research which i'm doing now, is to design a complete system with the use of solar pumps, lights, equipments which will have an effect in decreasing the usage of fuels.
Joel (Oct 16, 2009) San Francisco USA
LEED
This article (or maybe the study) is misleading. LEED's approach is holistic. They should also consider all of the places energy may have been saved during construction (locally sourced products, recycling construction materials).
Granted energy use is important, but a building's energy use is more than the utility bill that shows up every month.
Also consider the source of the energy, what if a perceived increased use is sourced from PV solar panels, or wind energy?
And LEED is also Environmental Design, the philosophy of creating a user experience that is physicall and mentally healthier.
I don't think the system is perfect, but only pointing out vague notions of a negative impact aren't helpful.
Peter Kincl (Oct 16, 2009) NY USA
LEED
Given that:
1. It is entirely possible for a building to acquire enough points to become LEED certified without doing anything to limit energy use, and,
2. 84% of an average building?s energy usage is in heating, cooling, hot water and electricity (and only 12% is embedded in its construction - including manufacture and transport of all the materials used),
it matters that a LEED certification means nothing in terms of energy conservation. LEED allows the building industry to continue doing pretty much what it always has been doing with a little fig leaf to make it look ?green?. It is time to grow up and replace LEED with real quantifiable standards of energy use (i.e. Btu/sq.ft. or Wh/sq.m.)
buz (Oct 15, 2009) California USA
LEED
LEED is a noble cause for informed design. It is not the answer...and could prove to be costly.... only to spawn new idustry and burearcratic nightmare. Still, who among us is willing to give up the family car and the parking space just outside...not me.
David Wallerstedt (Oct 15, 2009) Albuquerque USA
LEED energy use
Sustainability is more than just immediate energy use. Prevention of waste and polution of resources is an energy saving device that may have been overlooked.
pat (Oct 15, 2009) Englishtown USA
Leed
I hope the buz about LEED would not create a and elitest buearacracy that may hurt its intended and ultimate purpose of reducing and saving energy.
FEATURED COMMENT
The importance of green buildings is to decrease the ammount of pollution and to avoid using the materials with high saf