Architectural education in the GCC

[More Images]

By Dr Alaa Mandour,Sultan Qaboos University, Oman

What is the meaning of the term “Architectural Education?” It conveys the notion of formal, structured, paced and supervised training. Training that is well balanced in terms of subject matter, methods, techniques and aims, which is constantly evaluated and re-evaluated, and, when completed, somehow recognized by external authorities as intrinsically sufficient to allow an individual to practice architecture.

Architecture was principally a craft in the pre-modern period. And like many crafts that are instantly applicable to everyday life, architecture then depended more on apprenticeship than on theoretical knowledge – and it did so across cultures. Research shows that no medieval culture developed a body of theoretical and historical knowledge as a prerequisite for its architects and builders to practice their craft. They only needed to learn by monitoring and by reiterating what their masters did.

Nowadays, architectural education and practice in the GCC is facing a dramatic situation. There are incessant endeavours to improve architectural inputs to rearrange the structure of the educational method, to test accepted ideas, and to prod prospect apparitions. However many researchers have revealed fundamental disagreements over the goals and objectives, structure and contents and tools and techniques required for architectural education today.

While agreement is still lacking on what changes and developments in education will best support the ambition of modern societies, architecture students and educators must adhere to international standards but also incorporate a critical approach to the reading of the traditional environment as an essential part of curricula.

Story continues below

Advertisement

FEATURED COMMENT I am an Associate Professor in the Department of Architecture & Planning, Dawood College of Engineering & Technology, Ka   2 Comments Read more comments »

If we examine the core context of architectural courses throughout the GCC, most of it tends to lack a clear orientation. It tends to be project-oriented rather than be based on an explicit goal-based pedagogical philosophy – although promising initiatives are being taken in the documentation of heritage preservation and the philosophical aspects of planning and building craftsmanship within Muslim traditions and history!

Unfortunately, in GCC courses, teaching methods and curricula still tend to be conspicuously influenced by foreign models and Western references. In my opinion, there is too heavy an emphasis on design theory and too keen a focus on aesthetics, material choice and physical comfort rather than social needs and realities. Issues of culture, socio-economic needs, indigenous techniques, technologies and materials and even climate are rarely perceived as valid issues for the curriculum.

We can argue that this approach needs to surpass the discourse of form and ornament by involving a more responsive approach. With regard to culture in contemporary architectural thinking and teaching, we should be discussing a new academic sensibility that shapes the ways in which architectural history and theory are approached; the role culture can play in the shaping this sensibility; and the conceptual and ethical problems inherent in cultural representations. In short, we need to be consciously addressing the ‘correct’ balance of practice and theory.

A large majority of GCC educators seem to be teaching their students how to preserve history, how to retain the socio-cultural aspects and what are the considerations to be involved in their designs.

But, when we go back to the kitchen the recipe gets tweaked and the Western ingredients appear, mostly because they are the only ingredients available in the market.

In fact, all the information sources come from the West and the curricula for the very universities in which we teach are set up by experts from USA and Europe. So, it’s no wonder that the ‘dish’ created is something alien; something that simply adds a bit of cultural spice in the form of parapets or wind towers.